links for 2007-08-31
Aug 31, 2007
-
19 September - Learn how to reach out to the right audience, with the right message, at the right time.
I have worked on email marketing campaigns in the past that included the subscriber’s first name in the subject line. The open rates on these campaigns were always much higher than the same message sent with a generic subject line without personalization.
At the time, there was a lot of discussion about the reason behind it. One thought is that the person who has provided their first name was more interested. A warmer lead. Another thought is that people are excited to see a message sent directly to them. I believe it could be both of these combined.
I recently received an email from J.C. Whitney, a retailer that sells “Everything Automotive” The Subject Line:
Maddy, Don't Wait! Order Now And Make No Payments For Up to 12 Months!
The exclamation marks and overall feel may have landed this message in junk folders. When I saw this in my inbox, my first name jumped out at me and was intriguing enough to get an open out of me.
Much like my thoughts on using questions in the subject line I would urge the use of first names in subject lines sparingly. Overuse will cause your subscribers to ignore your message.
Could the best subject line ever be a “Personalized Question”? If you have ever tried this tactic, I would love to hear about your results.
The Email Experience Council today announced that the holiday email marketing season for retailers has begun. Along with the announcement, the EEC released “Ring-Cha-Ching, Hear Them Ring: The Guide to Gearing Up for the Holiday Email Season,” a 15-page report that discusses retail email marketing trends and practices from the past holiday season.
It offers specific ideas, examples, and results from last years’ holiday campaigns by some of the largest retailers in the online space.
Some highlights from the report:
The guide can be purchased for $99 by visiting the EEC’s Whitepaper Room.
A study released today revealed that marketers should begin attending to Sender Policy Framework (SPF) authentication to improve e-mail deliverability.
For the first time, according to a statement from Stefan Pollard, director of consulting services at EmailLabs, SPF checks are becoming part of content filter tests done by Internet service providers. These checks, which compare the sender’s return path domain and the IP address to a list of approved IPs the sender includes in their DNS zone, are often failed because a company changes IP addresses or e-mail service providers, and doesn’t update its SPF records.
The Lyris’ EmailAdvisor ISP Deliverability Report Card for Q2 2007 measured the delivery path of more than 436,000 permission-based e-mail marketing messages using ISP domains in the United States, Canada, Europe and Australia.
Increased attention to SPF ratings requires marketers to ensure that their SPF records are current in order to maintain delivery rates for permission-based messages. SPF record maintenance is not something done automatically by ISPs. But failing an SPF check can carry double the spam-rating penalty compared to the other Top 10 spam triggers identified in the study.
Source: DM News
Find out more about SPF and authentication here:
Check out also this overview of authentication resources on Mark Brownlow's blog.
In his ClickZ column, Stefan Pollard gives us some insights into how content filters work:
"Many major content filters rate messages according to how many elements in them are commonly associated with spam, such as copy, format, coding, and headers.
A content filtering system doesn't automatically flag a message because it contains one or two words associated with spam. Instead, a system like SpamAssassin runs hundreds of tests on a message, searching for spam-like elements. When the system encounters one, it assigns a point value, from a fraction for a suspect word to several points for major infractions, such as being blacklisted.
If a message accumulates too many points, the filtering system flags it as spam. Just how many points it takes to cross the threshold depends on how the filters are configured at the destination. Some are set very low, with three to five points being all that's needed. Others are more liberal.
More issues are also likely to trigger filters and collect higher point values than those assigned to words in the message body. They include:
Using "free" in a subject line or "click here" in the body may add a fraction of a point to a total content score, but if other e-mail elements are in good order, the message shouldn't be flagged as spam.
How concerned should you be about content filtering?
Most of the time, major portals such as Hotmail, Yahoo, and AOL rely more on the sender's reputation than on message content. Even if content scores high with the filters, a good reputation should help messages get to an inbox.
Most corporations rely on content filters to block spam. Thus, content plays a larger role in business-to-business (B2B) message delivery.
You know your market segments. Analyze domain names in your e-mail address database, and you'll see your major destinations."
Source: ClickZ
I was resistant. I kept saying no. I refused. We were not getting Xbox Live.
Until…
The beloved Xbox 360 had to be sent in for a warranty repair. The fine folks at Microsoft tried and tried and after about six weeks, admitted defeat and sent a brand new Xbox 360 to my house. Because the machine was gone for the bulk of the summer (pure torture for my ten year old “gamer”) we received a one month complimentary subscription to Xbox Live.
I gave in.
As a part of the sign up process for Xbox Live I had to provide my email address.
There is a lot to Xbox Live. In an effort to inform new subscribers about all of the features, Xbox Live sent me three emails over the course 12 days.
I assume this is an automated campaign that rolls the messages out on a predetermined schedule. Using a recurring messaging feature as a way to welcome new subscribers by showing them the ins and the outs of all you have to offer is a great way start the relationship.
A welcome email should come immediately after sign-up. It should thank users for opting in, explain what they can expect from your email program and get them excited to receive the next one.
In this article, Whitney Hutchinson says these are the components of a successful welcome email:
Read the article here and find some good examples across the industry.
Source: Email Insider
Without proper testing, there is no way to tell what your customers are actually seeing or how they are responding to your message.
In this article, Spencer Kollas tells us to start with establishing a comprehensive plan that outlines what you want to test, what you will consider a success or a failure and how you will measure this.
What can/should you test?
Source: iMedia Connection
Melinda Krueger asked some industry experts if suspect words will get you filtered. Here's what they replied:
Loren McDonald (JL Halsey) says content CAN get you filtered, but it is more likely going to be a combination of several words, phrases, not passing SPF tests, using bad code, etc., then combined with your reputation scores….
According to George Bilbrey (Return Path), very few delivery issues are based on keywords. The most common problems are:
Josh Baer (Skylist) says it’s worth noting that each ISP is different and while the big ones are more advanced, others are often still archaic. They may be using outdated tactics or old versions of software like SpamAssassin instead of the latest version.
Ray Everett-Church (Habeas) concurs: "Unfortunately many smaller ISPs and untold thousands of businesses are still using filtering/blocking technologies that can only be charitably described as archaic and/or ham-handed."
Source: Email Insider
Yesterday Bronto's DJ Waldow pointed a fellow member of the Email Marketer's Club to a page that contains guidelines for email marketers to get their emails delivered in the Gmail inbox.
Some key take-aways:
There are two important factors that, under normal circumstances, help messages arrive in Gmail users' inboxes:
If you are sending mail in accordance with their guidelines and Gmail continues to mark your messages as spam, you can contact the Gmail Team.
According to a Direct Magazine survey of DMers concerning the online practices scheduled to come out in September's issue, 14% of traditional business-to-consumer DMers say they send marketing emails to people on an opt-out basis. "And it's not just fly-by-night direct marketers that are spamming. I personally have received unsolicited e-mail from Circuit City, Kmart, Colgate-Palmolive, Williams-Sonoma, Plow & Hearth and, of all things, Smithsonian magazine", Ken Magill says.
The sad thing is that this practice is even legal in the US (except for some states like Utah). But let's be clear: even if it's legal, that doesn't mean that it's the right thing to do! How do you feel when you receive an email in your inbox that you did not sign up for? Do you "report it as spam"? I know I do. I have zero tolerance for emails that arrive in my inbox without me requesting them -- unless they are highly relevant to me.
So be careful: by running your email program on an opt-out basis, you risk having high complaint rates at the big ISPs and that will serious impact the inbox delivery of your future emails. Keep in mind: ISPs are under no obligation to deliver your emails.
Source: directmag.com via The Email Wars.
Peter Kim, an analyst at Forrester Research in Boston, created a top 20 list of marketing blogs called The M20: Top Marketer Blogs. The blogs on this list are all blogs that are written by corporate marketing professionals. And I'm proud to say that this blog is ranked #4!
To rank each blog Peter put together metrics of authority, attention, and influence:
Here's the list:
Peter will update this list on a monthly basis.
It's part of human nature that makes us helpers. My kids are always asking if they can help cook dinner, wash the car, and put away groceries. Why? Because it makes them feel good to help.
It's no wonder when I saw the subject line in a message from Chadwick's today I immediately opened the message. "Please help our design team & get $20 off".
They even said "Please".
By voting on my favorite cover for the upcoming fall catalog I can get $20 off my order of $80 or more.
I clicked on my favorite and received the code. The message on the landing page said "Look for your new Fall catalog in the mail"
This is a great multi-channel approach that really engages subscribers. Now I have an opportunity to save if I order between now and August 27th and I will be paying close attention to my traditional mail over the next several weeks to see if the cover I selected was the winner.
And, I'll probably make another purchase then too.
The eec will be holding its first annual event - the Email Evolution Conference - February 11-13, 2008 in San Diego, California.
This launch event is designed to be the major annual gathering of all levels of marketing professionals who are tackling their on-the-job marketing solutions. The event will have three major components:
Stay tuned for more information on this event coming in the next few weeks.
PetSmart sends a message each month promoting ways to save money with their PetPerks Program.
I received their latest message last night.
And after reading about the personalized email marketing messages from Columbia Sportswear I realized that PetSmart wasn’t doing the best job of speaking to their subscribers.
The message that landed in my inbox had "Specials for Dogs", "Specials for Cats", "Specials for Fish" and a "Grooming Special". Here's the problem with that. I have two short-haired dogs. No cats or fish and those short-haired dogs don't go to the groomer.
Three quarters of the advertised specials don't apply to me.
Had PetSmart asked for my preferences they would know that I'm not interested in cats, fish, grooming, hamsters, snakes or anything other than dog products. And with only a way to unsubscribe, rather than update my preferences, PetSmart may never know that while I'm interested in receiving messages from them, I don't really care about their "Specials for Cats".
By using subscriber preferences combined with a dynamic content strategy, PetSmart could send highly targeted messages that would speak to each individual subscriber.